Who Needs a CIO?

The Long Tail, in "Who Needs a CIO?" reinforces some of the points I made in my recent post My Intranet Sucks.

You might have expected, as I had, that most Chief Information Officers wanted to know about the latest trends in technology so they could keep ahead of the curve. Nothing of the sort. CIOs, it turns out, are mostly business people who have been given the thankless job of keeping the lights on, IT wise. And the best way to ensure that they stay on is to change as little as possible.

No wonder that the prevailing discussion among the university CIOs was about "relevance". Users no longer value what they do. It doesn't require a "C" title to keep fat pipes to the wide-open Internet open. A zillion free hosted services on the web have replaced the functionality of the IT departments service by service, just as minerals replace the cells in dinosaur bones. Talk of extinction was in the air, and rightly so.

Somehow I doubt that my IT department will "get out of the way" and let the employees, the real innovators in the company, use internet-based tools for "confidential" corporate business. Sigh.

Technorati tags for this post:

Allowed html tags: br p blockquote i b em code strong u ol ul li a
(type "human" here)